Home › Content

Ingo Rademacher Stars Alongside Tyler Perry in I, Alex Cross

By Jillian Bowe on March 07, 2012
Tags:
10
comments


 
Don't feel too bad about Ingo Rademacher not being on General Hospital. The actor is costarring  with Tyler Perry, in the film adaptation of James Patterson's I, Alex Cross!
 

 The story revolves around Dr. Alex Cross discovering a family member's murder, and his pledge to bring the killer to justice. Cross soon learns this isn't the murderer's first victim and is pulled into a deeper mystery. Rademacher will play Officer Sacks in the film.

I, Alex Cross hits theaters Oct. 26.

Photos by PR Photos.

 
 

Comments

Submitted by mipeony on March 7, 2012 - 12:04pm
#1
mipeony's picture
Member since:
23 September 2010
Last activity:
1 day 1 hour

Good for him!

Submitted by alstonboy4315 on March 7, 2012 - 12:16pm
#2
alstonboy4315's picture
Member since:
12 February 2010
Last activity:
3 days 14 hours

Ingo is an ungrateful jackass who does NOT deserve to have steady work in Hollyweird. Sick of self-entitled people like him snatching up all the jobs and humble actors being stuck on the sidelines! Not right!!

Submitted by GHdoolFan on March 7, 2012 - 12:24pm
#3
Member since:
7 June 2011
Last activity:
1 year 6 weeks

Alstonboy, I couldn't have said it better myself. He's a jackass. Sounds like as minor a role as you can get though. He's probably in one scene and discovers a dead body or something. Work is work, but I wouldn't call it "costarring." Maybe making an appearance.

Submitted by js3557 on March 7, 2012 - 2:36pm
#4
js3557's picture
Member since:
28 September 2009
Last activity:
1 day 2 hours

Tyler Perry as Alex Cross? WTF? Was the casting director on crack? Did anyone involved with the movie actually read the books? This is ridiculous! Alex Cross always should have been played by Denzel Washington. The end.

Submitted by Miry on March 7, 2012 - 7:30pm
#5
Miry's picture
Member since:
30 October 2008
Last activity:
1 day 10 min

@JS: ITA!!

Submitted by josstheguy on March 7, 2012 - 11:53pm
#6
Member since:
11 April 2009
Last activity:
23 hours 6 min

Denzel is too old for the role. Alex Cross has to be in his late 30s early 40s to continue in the sequels.

Also, why do people not like Ingo? What has he said or done that's so terrible?

Submitted by david46208 on March 8, 2012 - 12:17am
#7
david46208's picture
Member since:
15 January 2009
Last activity:
41 min 59 sec

The role was supposed to have gone to Don Cheadle. What happened? Why did they decide to give it to him? He can't play straight well...Sorry it's the truth!

Submitted by Forever21 on March 8, 2012 - 3:27am
#8
Forever21's picture
Member since:
22 April 2011
Last activity:
4 days 14 hours

josstheguy wrote:
Denzel is too old for the role. Alex Cross has to be in his late 30s early 40s to continue in the sequels.
Also, why do people not like Ingo? What has he said or done that's so terrible?

For some folks Ingo committed the ultimate sin of not bowing at the FV/RC altar

Submitted by js3557 on March 8, 2012 - 9:11am
#9
js3557's picture
Member since:
28 September 2009
Last activity:
1 day 2 hours

josstheguy - I am a HUGE fan of the Alex Cross series. The books started in 1992 and continue today. Alex Cross has aged to the point where he now has a son in college. Denzel should have been Alex from the beginning and Hollywood should have made movies out of select books from the series so that now they would be almost in time with the books, and Denzel would have always been the perfect age for the character. Actually, I believe that in the book this movie is based on (I, Alex), the character's oldest son is finishing up high school and the character of Alex is not in his 30's or even his early 40's. Denzel would be perfect.

Submitted by Miry on March 8, 2012 - 12:37pm
#10
Miry's picture
Member since:
30 October 2008
Last activity:
1 day 10 min

Once again, ITA JS!!