According to Soap Opera Digest, Christie Clark will reprise her role on Days of Our Lives. Clark's alter ego Carrie makes her way back to Salem Feb. 2011.
Photo by PR Photos.
Attack? all I said was "calm down." You were unjustifiably going off on Days and I thought you should relax. LOL. Christie isn't even back for good. But you seem crazy, so I won't be responding to anything else you might say. you need help.
Butt out, Brando! It's none of your damn business how I react!!! Nosy little busybody...ugh!
Are you 7? You act 7.
I didn't ask your opinion, Brando. Stop stalking and harassing me.
Very creative, Brando!!! Keep it coming, please!
OMGOSH! i hope CC will be on for more than just an appearance!!! so love Carrie! & if she does return i hope days brings back Austin in the form of AP!! that might bring some ATWT fans into the DAYS fold who knows?
^^ No. The original Austin, Patrick Muldoon, is the best choice. He never should have left in 1995.
I'd actually accept either of the two Austins back, but I was never a very big fan of the Carrie character. She just wasn't all that smart.
WTF? Carrie was extremely smart. Carrie has always been a sweet, innocent, trusting character and that's why she's tied with Marlena as my #1 favourite Days character of all time. It's not her fault she had an evil whackjob for a sister.
Always liked the character of Carrie. I don't always like the good girl characters but I did enjoy her. She was part of one of the greatest moments of Days history when she exposed Sami and punched her at the wedding. That was great. Will be nice to see her again even for just a brief visit.
And Allistair Crane I did watch Carrie back in the day and she NEVER drove story. Her role was to be Sami's punching bag. She was simply the obsticle to Sami being with her love Ausin. That is what Carrie was and with out Austin (which noone mentioned Austin returning) Carrie brings nothing to the show on her own. Every time I say that you get mad and say "well Carrie and Austin blah blah blah" which only PROVES my point. Without Austin, Carrie's character has nothing going on. If one brought back oh say Marlena alone, Marlena would get right into something and create a story for herself. There would be a stalker or a grandkid or kid or something to get her going. With Carrie alone well ya get NADA.
You're truly out of touch, Mark. The story was about Carrie and Austin's love. SAMI was the obstacle, the thing that got in the way of the true love supercouple Austin and Carrie from being together.
NO ONE wants to see Carrie and Austin on Days separately. The whole point is that they are a SUPERCOUPLE and need to be on the show TOGETHER!!!!
Did that get through your thick skull? Now FOAD!
Unfortunately the day of the supercouple on soap opera has left us. So even if Carrie and Austin were a supercouple....and i am not sure that they qualify as one.....current soaps don't really give us supercouples any more. And if every supercouple were on Days and in stable relationships....well then we wouldn't have a very interesting soap opera.
Except Days is the Supercouple Soap. There's John/Marlena, Jack/Jennifer, Bo/Hope, Patch/Kayla, Shane/Kim, Carrie/Austin, and Belle/Shawn to name a few. The fact that they have written out the major supercouples or only written back in one half of the supercouple is why these silly soaps are losing ratings. Fans want to see the supercouples together, not torn apart. It's very easy to tell good, dynamic, exciting stories with couples in a stable relationship. In the glory days of the supercouple, Bo and Hope were too busy saving the world to be concerned with third parties trying to break them up. THAT is how soap operas should write their supercouples. Until they do, I'm glad I no longer watch this awful show formerly known as Days of Our Lives.
Except that AlistairCrane ALWAYS gets it wrong. All of the stories about Sami/Austin/Carrie/Lucas were ALWAYS told from Sami's POV. NOT Carries. Sami was NOT the antagonist, she was the protagonist. Carrie was the antagonist in the story because she was the obstacle in Sami's way to Austin. Sami was always always always the main character in the story. It's hard to imagine that people never noticed that. Just because Sami was the bitch and Carrie was the good guy, your pea brain couldn't wrap your head around the fact that the story was told from Sami's point of view. That is the reason why Sami and not Carrie is still the star of the show. She was the main character of the young people of that time period. When we lost interest in those characters they were gone. But Sami remains. Because she was and still is the story.
As for supercouples, as much as they tried, Belle and Shawn never cut it as a supercouple. Everyone wanted them to be a supercouple so badly, both the audience (me included) and the show, that they kept trying but the only way to give them that status was to ship them off together. Because nothing else worked. None of the actors that played the characters had any chemistry with their costar. It might have been interesting to see Brandon Beemer
with Kirstin Storms. Kirstin always treated Jason Cook like a boy and almost contemptuously. Like why do I have to work with such imaturity?
But I bet she woulda sit up straight if Brandon had been her Shawn.
I too miss the days of the couple to root for. I keep hoping that will happen for Rafe and Sami. EJ and Sami have too much bad blood. I am still also holding out for Chad and Will but I think that too many pretty girls cast recently have sealed their doom. They are gonna ignore the obvious and palapable chemistry those two have. I do like Stephano and Kate but I am not sure supercouple could apply here. With Victor and Maggie, I think Maggie has too much integrity to be with Victor. Even if she tried, I think he would manage to ruin it. Nicole and EJ have something that I like but again supercouples are supposed to be the good guys...
They were NEVER from Sami's POV, moron. They were about Carrie and Austin struggling to be together. Someone needs to cut off your fingers and tongue, Mark, you friggin' retard.